An irritating difference between liberals and conservatives.

I was delighted yesterday when Rep.  Alan Grayson (D) – FL decided to give the Republicans a taste of their own medicine on the House floor.  His tongue-in-cheek speech that the GOP’s health care plan consists of “don’t get sick” and if you do to “die quickly” was intended to drive home the point that the Republicans’ politically motivated opposition to reform will simply perpetuate the problem.

Predictably, the irony-challenged and apparently amnesiac House Republicans seized on Grayson’s remarks (which don’t differ substantively from the pronouncements of Grayson’s Republican colleagues), sanctimoniously demanding an apology and comparing him to Rep. Joe Wilson (R) – SC. I don’t really want to go down that road as it’s already being explored except to ask how many of those Republicans voted against the measure to censure Wilson?

I’m more interested in the liberal reaction to Grayson.

Last night on MSNBC I watched as Keith Olbermann and Ariana Huffington lauded Grayson while tut-tutting Grayson’s use of the word ‘holocaust’. Later Rachel Maddow did the same thing and during her interview with Grayson, she asked him at least three times whether he regretted his use of the word. Not only did this make me angry, it got me thinking.

I don’t contend that Olbermann, Huffington and Maddow are wrong to take exception with Grayson’s use of the word ‘holocaust’. I agree with them that it’s both a distraction and an inaccurate comparison.  But I think that the real distraction is that they feel the need to chide him for it.

Imagine if a Republican had made an identical speech. Would Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh criticize their fellow traveler for an unfortunate choice of words? No. They would circle the wagons and press their point.

Conservatives are better at gut-level communications. They aren’t afraid of their own shadows. Wrong as they are, you have to give them credit for sticking to their guns. They ruthlessly deliver their message to its intended recipients.

Opponents of reform would much rather argue about decorum and the proper usage of ‘holocaust’ than fix the existing system. Olbermann, Huffington and Maddow are simply playing into their hands. In this regard they remind of the so-called Blue dog Democrats. If health reform is defeated or watered down so as to be meaningless it will be the Blue dogs’ fault, not the Republicans.  If Democrats like Grayson who want to take a stand fail to deliver their message, part of the responsibility for that failure will rest with PC-obsessed media liberals who dilute that message with silly nattering over his choice of words.

The Democrats need more Graysons. People who aren’t afraid to call the hypocrites out. Instead of eating their own, the three aforementioned liberals (all of whom I like and respect) need to be driving home Grayson’s point. Health reform is too important to bother with self-defeating arguments over semantics.


5 thoughts on “An irritating difference between liberals and conservatives.

  1. blissbait says:

    I’m so stunned I can’t comment in haiku, which is what I do.

    ARGH! I wasn’t aware this had occurred and I am STUNNED that the reaction was such. I don’t even consider the use of the word ‘holocaust’ to be off. “Holocaust” means mass slaughter or destruction. “THE Holocaust” refers strictly to Hitler’s horrific legacy. Unfortunately there have been MANY holocausts in our history, and if we don’t lighten/wise up there will probably be more. One’s probably happening right now. So where’s the offense? Even if he was giving them a taste of their own medicine by referring to the one involving Hitler just to get their goat, it makes sense to me because don’t the crazy extreme GOPs call Obama “Hitler” every other sentence? I don’t see him running crying to his mommy. He just keeps on keepin’ on trying to undo this mess we’re in!

    Geez. Illustrative speech can be effective. Everyone I know hates holocausts of any kind. Backbones all around, PLEASE.

    Thanks for Your post. You got me riled! What just happened?! 🙂

    Peace All.

  2. indyfromaz says:

    Yes, comments like sure will spark that “Bi-Partisan” feel the President wants.
    And the very civil calls of “un-american” “stupid” “racist” “sexist” are all going to further the discussion.

  3. bobmichaels says:

    If you think Healthcare is bad now, wait till you get what you want! Name one thing that was better and better managed once the government got involved?

  4. The U.S. financial system after depression-era reforms. Roads. Public universities. The space program. The military. Workplace safety. Food safety. National parks. Rural electrification. Medicare. Social Security. The list goes on and on……..

    You seem to be missing the OPTION part of Public Option. If you want to keep your crappy private insurance that costs too much, doesn’t cover everything and drops you as soon as you get sick you have the OPTION of doing so.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s